Hadith 2471

(1) The statement: "Does not have to make up the fast" – What is narrated in the Sunan of Ibn Majah: "He went out on a day he was fasting, then he called for a vessel and drank. We said: 'O Messenger of Allah, this is a day you were fasting.' He said: 'Yes, but I was overcome by vomiting,'" is understood to refer to what occurred before the legislation or due to the onset of weakness. This is mentioned by the scholar Ibn al-Humam. In ‘Al-Mirqat’: Ibn al-Mubarak said: "It is said that the narration of Abu al-Darda’ is a report of the Prophet’s (ﷺ) vomiting, but it is not known whether he broke his fast due to vomiting or something else. It is known from his statement: 'Whoever is overcome by vomiting' (the hadith) that vomiting is not a reason for breaking the fast, so it is clear that the reason is something else, such as the return of what was vomited or water reaching the throat while rinsing the mouth. The statement of Thawban: 'He spoke the truth' is a confirmation of the vomiting and breaking the fast, not a confirmation that breaking the fast was due to vomiting."

(۱) قوله: فليس عليه قضاء وما روي في سُنَن ابن ماجه: «أنه خرج في يوم كان يصومه، فدعا بإناء، فشرب، فقلنا: يا رسول الله! إن هذا يوم كنت تصومه. قال: أجل، ولكني قِنْتُ محمول على ما قبل الشرع أو عروض الضعف. قاله الشيخ ابن الهمام. وفي المرقاة»: قال ابن المبارك: قيل: رواية أبي الدرداء حكاية قيء النبي ﷺ لا يعلم أنه لا لأي علة أفطر للقيء أو لغيره، وقد علم من قوله: من ذرعه القيء» (الحديث). أن القيء لا يكون سببا للفطر، فظهر أن السبب غيره، وهو عود ما قاء، أو وصول الماء إلى الجوف عند غسل الفم، وقول ثوبان: صدق» تصديق للقيء والإفطار، لا تصديق كون الإفطار للقيء.